Logistics Viewpoints

Providing logistics professionals with clear and concise analyses of Logistics Trends, Technologies, and Services.

Brought to you by ARC Advisory Group

Founded in 1986, ARC Advisory Group has grown to become the thought leader in logistics, supply chain, and manufacturing solutions

Register/Log In

New to Logistics Viewpoints? REGISTER
Already registered? LOG IN to post comments
Sign up for Daily Email below!

Is logistics a cost center or a competitive differentiator?  Is it a core competency or a function that should be outsourced?

I would argue that most CEOs, at least historically, have viewed logistics as a cost center (trucks, warehouses, overhead, etc.), a business function that falls short of their “core competency” definition.  This perspective has led to the ongoing growth (except for this year) of the logistics outsourcing (3PL) industry.

Of course, just because a business function is not considered a core competency, or is outsourced to a third party, doesn’t necessarily mean that it’s not valued by the CEO.  The true test of value is whether a CEO is willing to continue investing in logistics, either internally—in people, technology, assets, etc.—or by developing more strategic relationships with 3PL partners.  If neither type of investment is taking place, then you have a problem.

Is this the case at your company?  If so, how do you explain the value of logistics to your CEO?

The common advice is to communicate the value of logistics in terms the CEO, as well as the CFO, can understand.  In other words, you have to speak their language, which entails linking logistics with financial metrics.  Unfortunately, many logistics executives are financial illiterates.  If you can’t read and understand an income statement or balance sheet, for example, then your ability to effectively communicate the value of logistics to the CEO/CFO is severely limited.

Placing logistics in a financial context will get your foot in the door, but is it enough?

I don’t think so.  CEOs suffer from a similar deficiency: most of them are supply chain and logistics illiterates.  They are often the weakest link in a company’s supply chain, as Rueben E. Slone,  Executive VP of Supply Chain at Office Max, and his co-authors wrote in “Are You the Weakest Link in Your Company’s Supply Chain?” (Harvard Business Review, September 2007).  “In this article,” the authors wrote, “we advise CEOs not to become unwitting weak links in their companies’ own supply chain strategies.  The costs of neglecting important matters of supply chain management are damaging to any type of business for which SCM is potentially a competitive differentiator (most notably, manufacturing, retail, and distribution).  CEOs should get involved.

Sir William Osler, MD, the father of modern medicine, once said, “Medicine is learned by the bedside and not in the class room. Let not your conception of manifestations of disease come from work heard in the lecture room or read from the book: see and then research, compare and control. But see first.”

In order for CEOs to truly appreciate the value of logistics, they too must see first…by spending the day picking goods at the warehouse; driving shotgun on a delivery truck; finding capacity for uncovered loads; tracking and tracing shipments; building pallets near the loading dock; calling vendors overseas, and taking calls from customers, in both cases the same question: Where’s our order?

If getting your CEO immersed in your logistics operations is too much to ask, then have him attend a supply chain and logistics conference…or two or three, especially the ones organized by the software and technology vendors that power your logistics processes.  While not as good as see first, spending a few days with supply chain and logistics professionals, from many different companies and industries, presenting case studies and discussing industry trends, is still a valuable type of seeing and hearing.

How do you explain the value of logistics to a CEO?  You don’t.  The value has to be experienced firsthand, like getting soaked in the rain.  Everything else is just words and numbers.

  • Share/Bookmark
Categories : Just for Fun

1 Comments

1

I agree with Adrian that the CEO should endeavor to experience logistics firsthand to better gain an understanding of the logistics function within a broader strategic perspective.

I was recently reminded (in a different context) of the story of the three blind men and the elephant, and it occurs to me how well it describes the attempt to analyze a complex company’s logistics. While the term “core competency” can relatively easily be ascribed (or not) to many business functions, logistics is one animal that often defies simple categorization, and often straddles a grey zone in many organizations. There needs to be some understanding of the trees to better understand the forest (to mix metaphors).

While in some ways the movement of goods seems to be a commodity type function, unlike many other types of business functions that are commonly outsourced, logistics is often integrally tied to other processes that are mission critical, such as availability of inbound materials for manufacturing. Customer satisfaction can directly depend on logistics performance in customer deliveries – not a routine process in every organization. It may be clear for some organizations to say that logistics is – or is not – relied upon for competitive advantage, but for many organizations many of the checklist items fall into the grey zone.

Cost is another consideration that is not always easily quantified, as the projections and promises of alternative strategies are not so clearly predictable.

I think the biggest challenge in the outsource/insource analysis is for organizations that experience constant change in their transportation needs and requirements. Market conditions are always changing for shippers, customers and carriers. Corporations experience mergers, acquisitions, and divestitures. There are new products and sources, phase-outs and shut-downs. Shipping lanes and requirements are not static and there are changing business processes, relationships, and evolving information technologies. The more change that can be expected, the less it seems to make sense to invest heavily in an insourced infrastructure. Outsourcing provides flexibility and an operational cost structure that is one good way to hedge against change. Unknown change is arguably impossible to quantify.

In the ongoing debate of outsource vs. insource it seems that many can be dogmatic in asserting that one strategy is generally advantageous over the other, when in fact each company is its own kind of elephant. The CEO needs to not only get the feedback of the three blind men, but he must also it feel for himself to help him assimilate all the clues and synthesize an understanding.

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

© 2009 ARC Advisory Group. All Rights Reserved.

The content of Logistics Viewpoints may not be reproduced or distributed without prior written approval from ARC Advisory Group. Please read our Terms of Use for more details.
Do you need assistance identifying, evaluating, and selecting the right logistics software solution or logistics service provider for your company? Are you interested in having an on-site training seminar for your team on emerging logistics trends and technologies? Then contact us today to learn more about these services and the many other ways we can bring value to your company.