Logistics Viewpoints

Providing logistics professionals with clear and concise analyses of Logistics Trends, Technologies, and Services.

Brought to you by ARC Advisory Group

Founded in 1986, ARC Advisory Group has grown to become the thought leader in logistics, supply chain, and manufacturing solutions

Register/Log In

New to Logistics Viewpoints? REGISTER
Already registered? LOG IN to post comments
Sign up for Daily Email below!

I’ve been writing about the Demand Signal Repository (DSR) market a fair bit recently (see, for example, “How to Best Describe Demand Signal Repositories”). DSR solutions leverage a variety of different types of downstream data, including POS data, to power more robust and dynamic forms of replenishment. 

As the saying goes, “everyone talks about the weather, but nobody does anything about it.”  Well, when it comes to supply chain management, most companies know about the bullwhip effect, but very few do anything about it. Dynamic replenishment, based on downstream data, finally offers a way for companies to “do something about it.”

When it comes using short-term forecasts for responsive replenishment, software solutions approach this in one of three ways. First, it can be done with flowcasting methodologies. In flowcasting, a store-level forecast by SKU is done. This is converted into a forecast that is propagated upstream from the stores and aggregated into replenishment requirements. This is how RedPrairie (an ARC client) has approached the problem. RedPrairie claims that a technology breakthrough allows its solution to efficiently handle the mountain of detailed data involved in this process. André Martin, the CEO of RedPrairie Collaborative Flowcasting Group, has worked with a major food company using this methodology. For related commentary, see “Eliminating the Bullwhip Effect across the Extended Retail Supply Chain.” 

A second approach taken by some software vendors is to mimic store-level ordering policies. These solutions contain store order policy logic that anticipates what a store will order from the consumer goods manufacturer. One Network (a Logistics Viewpoints sponsor) is the primary practitioner of this style of responsive replenishment. One Network provides both the core data repository and supply chain applications in a software-as-a-service (SaaS) model. The data repository contains retailer and supplier master data, transactional data, and the stores’ replenishment policy information. Del Monte is a One Network client that has publicly discussed its use of this framework. The company is leveraging both Walmart and Kroger downstream data to make better replenishment and transportation decisions. 

Terra Technology, who has had the most success selling short-term forecasting solutions based on downstream data, takes a third approach. Terra takes downstream data and uses pattern recognition. So, for example, for a large consumer goods manufacturer trading with Walmart, the Terra applications would have access to store inventory data, the store forecast of sales, distribution center (DC) withdrawals, DC inventory, and a DC’s open orders. The Terra solution looks at how to combine these data streams to produce the “most likely” forecast. One week out it may be that orders are most predictive. Two weeks out it might be DC withdrawals that have the most influence on the forecast.  Three weeks out, it might be POS sales that have the most predictive power. These weightings can differ by product, and product weightings might also differ based on the warehouse territory they are located in. 

Terra has been very successful with this approach. Procter & Gamble (P&G), after piloting at least one other solution (in which it played the role of coproduction partner) became a client in 2008 and publically stated that the Terra solution allowed it to lower its inventory by $100 million without adversely affecting service.  P&G’s savings on this would be the carrying costs, probably between 15 to 20 percent of the $100 million every year.

In many ways, the DSR market is still immature. However, when it comes to using downstream data for dynamic replenishment, good solutions already exist.

  • Share/Bookmark

1 Comments

1

Clearly, understanding demand at a detail level, by store, is paramount to repenishment. One area you have not discussed is the impact that price adjustments, promotions, end-of-life and replacement products has on the process. An adequate supply chain must consider these effects in determining the proper replen levels. This must be a SOP type relationship between the parties involved from store management up the line.

Steve Murray
Supply Chain Visions

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

© 2009 ARC Advisory Group. All Rights Reserved.

The content of Logistics Viewpoints may not be reproduced or distributed without prior written approval from ARC Advisory Group. Please read our Terms of Use for more details.
Do you need assistance identifying, evaluating, and selecting the right logistics software solution or logistics service provider for your company? Are you interested in having an on-site training seminar for your team on emerging logistics trends and technologies? Then contact us today to learn more about these services and the many other ways we can bring value to your company.