<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Toyota Recall</title>
	<atom:link href="http://logisticsviewpoints.com/2010/02/01/the-toyota-recall/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://logisticsviewpoints.com/2010/02/01/the-toyota-recall/</link>
	<description>Providing logistics professionals with clear and concise analyses of Logistics Trends, Technologies, and Services</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 22:19:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karthik.Mani</title>
		<link>http://logisticsviewpoints.com/2010/02/01/the-toyota-recall/comment-page-1/#comment-155</link>
		<dc:creator>Karthik.Mani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 13:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logisticsviewpoints.com/?p=2827#comment-155</guid>
		<description>I agree with Ralp&#039;s point to a degree. Once the system understood the seriousness of the issue, it reacted as it should. 

But as, jletart asks, why did it take them this long to react? Their sense and respond capability outside their production environment seems to have been severely lacking.  I am thinking that it is the sense and not the respond part. I have written a piece on this in my blog http://bit.ly/aQ7TKZ.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Ralp&#8217;s point to a degree. Once the system understood the seriousness of the issue, it reacted as it should. </p>
<p>But as, jletart asks, why did it take them this long to react? Their sense and respond capability outside their production environment seems to have been severely lacking.  I am thinking that it is the sense and not the respond part. I have written a piece on this in my blog <a href="http://bit.ly/aQ7TKZ" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/aQ7TKZ</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jilly</title>
		<link>http://logisticsviewpoints.com/2010/02/01/the-toyota-recall/comment-page-1/#comment-154</link>
		<dc:creator>Jilly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 16:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logisticsviewpoints.com/?p=2827#comment-154</guid>
		<description>&quot;Nothing fails like success&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Nothing fails like success&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jletart</title>
		<link>http://logisticsviewpoints.com/2010/02/01/the-toyota-recall/comment-page-1/#comment-153</link>
		<dc:creator>jletart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 16:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logisticsviewpoints.com/?p=2827#comment-153</guid>
		<description>Ralph&#039;s view of Toyota&#039;s actions might be valid if the problem had just been discovered. But reports say they knew about this problem as early as 2007. That makes their current response not about Lean or QA, but rather a desparate attempt to recover from poor management decisions in the past. Certainly they should not be lauded for their actions - past or present.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ralph&#8217;s view of Toyota&#8217;s actions might be valid if the problem had just been discovered. But reports say they knew about this problem as early as 2007. That makes their current response not about Lean or QA, but rather a desparate attempt to recover from poor management decisions in the past. Certainly they should not be lauded for their actions &#8211; past or present.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
